A devastating crash involving an Azerbaijan Airlines Embraer 190 passenger jet has claimed the lives of 38 individuals, leaving 29 survivors, including two children. The accident occurred on December 25, 2024, near Aktau, Kazakhstan, as the plane attempted an emergency landing. The flight had initially departed from Baku, Azerbaijan, bound for Grozny, Russia, but was diverted mid-journey due to reported technical and weather-related issues.
Conflicting Initial Reports
Officials initially cited worsening weather conditions and a possible collision with birds as causes for the crash. Azerbaijan’s President Ilham Aliyev and Kazakhstan’s Deputy Prime Minister Kanat Bozumbayev both urged caution, stating that investigations were ongoing and it was premature to assign blame. “The police and prosecutor’s office are conducting forensic examinations,” said Bozumbayev, cautioning against speculation. Similarly, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov warned, “It would be incorrect to make any hypotheses before the investigation comes to conclusions.”
However, emerging evidence and expert analysis have raised questions about the validity of these explanations. Videos and photographs of the wreckage reveal perforations and damage to the fuselage and tail that some experts have likened to shrapnel impact, fueling theories that external factors, including military activity, may have played a role.
Concerns About Air-Defense Systems
One of the leading theories suggests that Russian air-defense systems could have mistakenly targeted the plane. According to Matthew Borie, Chief Intelligence Officer at Osprey Flight Solutions, the plane was “likely shot down by a Russian air defense system.” Reports also indicate that Russian anti-aircraft defenses were active in the Grozny area at the time, responding to a Ukrainian drone strike. Justin Crump, an intelligence expert, described this theory as “the best that fits all available facts.”
A U.S. official echoed these concerns, stating that early indications point to a possible mistaken strike by Russian forces. If true, this would highlight the risks associated with military operations near civilian airspace. Ukrainian officials have also supported this claim, suggesting that Russia failed to close its airspace during the drone activity, potentially putting civilian flights at risk. “Russia was supposed to close the airspace over Grozny but did not do so,” said Andriy Kovalenko, head of Ukraine’s Center for Countering Disinformation.
Technical Challenges and Flight Path Deviations
Additional details about the flight path have complicated the investigation. According to Kazakhstan’s Minister of Transport, Marat Karabayev, the aircraft had experienced control system failures and an oxygen tank explosion, which forced the crew to change course toward Aktau. Flight data from Flightradar24 showed signs of GPS jamming and spoofing near Grozny, which could have disrupted the plane’s navigation and communication systems. The aircraft made two failed attempts to land at Aktau Airport before it crashed approximately 1.8 miles from the runway.
Survivor Accounts and International Reactions
The 29 survivors, including five individuals in critical condition, were transported to medical facilities for treatment. Of the passengers, 37 were Azerbaijani citizens, while others included Russians, Kazakhs, and Kyrgyz nationals. Azerbaijani state media reported that 12 survivors were being flown back to Baku for further care.
NATO expressed condolences to the victims’ families, calling for a thorough and transparent investigation. Meanwhile, Israel’s national airline, El Al, suspended its Tel Aviv-Moscow route, citing concerns over airspace safety. Embraer, the aircraft manufacturer, also released a statement expressing condolences and pledging support for investigators.
Historical Parallels and Broader Implications
The incident has drawn comparisons to past aviation tragedies, including the 2014 downing of Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17, which was struck by a missile in eastern Ukraine. If investigations confirm that military action caused the Azerbaijan Airlines crash, it could underscore the dangers of operating civilian flights in conflict zones.
Kazakhstan, Azerbaijan, and Russia have formed a joint investigative commission to examine all possible causes, including technical malfunctions, human error, and external impacts. The investigation’s findings could have significant implications for aviation safety protocols and the use of air-defense systems in regions with active military operations.
A Time of Mourning
Azerbaijan declared a national day of mourning in honor of the victims. The crash has left many questions unanswered, and the international community awaits the results of the investigation. While officials have urged patience, the mounting evidence of potential military involvement has heightened calls for accountability and stricter safety measures.
This article is based on the following articles:
https://www.ft.com/content/d8acfb6d-6987-4243-8c31-4a81a9a46a41
https://www.cnn.com/2024/12/26/asia/kazakhstan-plane-crash-questions-intl/index.html
Background Information
Understanding the Context of the Azerbaijan Airlines Crash
Azerbaijan and Its Airlines
Azerbaijan is a country in the South Caucasus region, situated between Europe and Asia. Its capital city, Baku, is known for its vibrant cultural heritage and strategic location along the Caspian Sea. Azerbaijan Airlines (AZAL) is the national airline of Azerbaijan, operating both domestic and international flights. The airline uses modern aircraft, such as the Embraer 190 involved in this crash, which is widely used for regional flights.
The Plane: Embraer 190
The Embraer 190 is a twin-engine jet designed for short to medium-range flights. It is considered reliable and popular among airlines worldwide due to its fuel efficiency and capacity of around 70–100 passengers. Accidents involving this model are rare, which makes this crash particularly concerning.
Geography and Airspace Issues
The flight was traveling from Baku to Grozny, the capital of Chechnya, a Russian republic in the North Caucasus. The North Caucasus region has complex terrain, with mountainous areas and volatile weather conditions that can make air travel challenging. Additionally, this region is near Ukraine, where ongoing conflicts have created risks for air travel. In such areas, military operations and heightened security measures can impact civilian flights.
The Role of Air Defense Systems
Air defense systems, such as the Russian S-300 and S-400 missile systems mentioned in reports, are designed to protect a country from airborne threats like enemy aircraft or drones. These systems use radar to detect objects in the sky and can launch missiles to destroy them. However, they require skilled operators to differentiate between civilian and military aircraft. Mistakes in such systems have led to tragic incidents, such as the downing of Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17 in 2014.
Drone Activity and Its Impacts
In recent years, drones have become an essential tool in military operations. These unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) are used for surveillance and attacks, and their increasing use has complicated airspace management. Drones can provoke air-defense responses, as seen in areas near the Ukraine-Russia conflict. This raises concerns about how civilian flights are protected in regions where drones are active.
Investigative Processes After Plane Crashes
When a plane crash occurs, multiple countries and organizations collaborate to investigate. Investigators examine evidence such as the wreckage, flight data recorders (often called “black boxes”), and air traffic control communications. Forensic analysis is conducted to identify the cause, whether it be technical failure, human error, or external factors like military action. These investigations are critical to improving aviation safety and preventing future tragedies.
International Implications
Crashes involving suspected military action can strain relations between countries. In this case, allegations against Russian air defenses could heighten tensions between Russia and neighboring countries like Azerbaijan and Ukraine. Such incidents also draw international attention to the importance of maintaining safe airspace, especially in conflict zones.
Past Aviation Incidents
To understand the broader implications, it’s helpful to recall similar incidents. For example, Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17 was shot down over eastern Ukraine in 2014, killing all 298 people aboard. An international investigation concluded that a Russian missile system had caused the crash. Such incidents highlight the dangers civilian aircraft face in areas of military conflict and the challenges of attributing responsibility.
The Role of Weather and Technical Issues
Weather plays a critical role in aviation safety. Poor visibility, heavy fog, or strong winds can make landing and navigation difficult, especially in regions like the North Caucasus. At the same time, aircraft rely on sophisticated navigation systems to maintain safe routes. Any interference with these systems, such as GPS jamming, can create confusion for pilots and increase the likelihood of accidents.
A Day of Mourning
In many cultures, a national day of mourning is declared to honor the victims of tragedies like this crash. Flags are flown at half-staff, and public events may be canceled as people reflect on the loss. This tradition helps unite communities in grief and show respect for those affected.
Please subscribe to Insight Fortnight, our biweekly newsletter!