Michael D. Cohen faced intense scrutiny from Todd Blanche, Donald Trump’s defense attorney. Cohen, previously known for his explosive demeanor, notably kept his composure during the questioning, a stark contrast to his previous testimony at Trump’s civil fraud trial. Blanche focused on discrediting Cohen by bringing up his history of dishonesty, emphasizing past lies and legal issues. One dramatic exchange occurred when Blanche accused Cohen of lying about a phone call made just before the 2016 election, which Cohen had claimed was to discuss a hush-money payment with Trump. Blanche suggested the call was actually about prank calls from a teenager to Trump’s bodyguard, Keith Schiller.
Blanche’s aggressive questioning aimed to cast doubt on Cohen’s reliability as a witness, with Cohen responding that he believed he had spoken to Trump during that call. This discrepancy over the call’s content is crucial, as it directly impacts Cohen’s credibility and the prosecution’s narrative.
1. The Phone Call
The phone call on October 24, 2016, which Cohen claimed was an update to Trump about the $130,000 payment to Stormy Daniels, became a focal point. Blanche argued that the call, which was made to Schiller’s phone, lasted only a minute and a half and was actually about prank calls from a teenager. This interpretation challenges Cohen’s testimony and is critical for the jury’s perception of his truthfulness.
2. Cohen’s Past Lies and Legal Issues
The defense capitalized on Cohen’s troubled past to undermine his testimony. Blanche meticulously recounted Cohen’s previous legal problems, including his 2018 guilty pleas for financial crimes and tax evasion, and his false statements to Congress. Cohen’s history of dishonesty was presented as a pattern, suggesting to the jury that he could not be trusted. This cumulative effect aimed to weaken the prosecution’s case by painting Cohen as an unreliable witness.
3. Motives and Shifts in Loyalty
Cohen’s motives for turning against Trump were explored extensively. Blanche suggested that Cohen’s testimony was driven by personal vendetta and dissatisfaction over not receiving a coveted White House position. Cohen, however, testified that his loyalty had shifted to his family and country after federal agents raided his home in 2018. He cited this raid as a turning point, saying his loyalty should have been to his wife, daughter, son, and country.
Blanche highlighted Cohen’s apparent glee in a 2020 podcast where Cohen celebrated the investigations into Trump, quoting Cohen’s statement, “revenge is a dish best served cold,” and his desire for Trump to “rot inside for what he did to me and my family.” This portrayal of Cohen seeking revenge aimed to suggest his testimony was influenced by personal grudges rather than truth.
4. Cohen’s Composure
Despite being called a liar, a loser, and a money-grubber in court, Cohen remained mostly calm and deliberate in his responses. Blanche’s attempts to provoke Cohen by mentioning slights and humiliations he suffered after Trump’s election victory, including not being appointed as chief of staff, were met with composed and measured answers. Cohen’s ability to maintain his temper under intense cross-examination was noteworthy, suggesting a strategic effort to appear credible and reliable to the jury.
5. The Trial’s Progress and Future Steps
Cohen’s cross-examination is expected to continue on Monday, with Blanche predicting it will conclude by noon. The prosecution may then re-interview Cohen before resting their case. The defense will then have its opportunity, although it remains uncertain whether Trump will testify. Judge Juan M. Merchan has instructed the lawyers to prepare for closing arguments by Tuesday, potentially allowing the jury to deliberate before the Memorial Day weekend.
This article is based on the following article:
Background Information
1. Donald Trump and Michael Cohen
- Donald Trump: Donald J. Trump served as the 45th President of the United States from January 20, 2017, to January 20, 2021. Before his presidency, he was a businessman and television personality. His tenure as president was marked by numerous controversies and legal challenges.
- Michael Cohen: Michael D. Cohen was Trump’s personal attorney and “fixer” for many years. He was known for his aggressive defense of Trump and his involvement in various legal and financial matters on Trump’s behalf. Cohen’s role included handling sensitive issues, such as arranging payments to silence individuals who might damage Trump’s reputation.
2. The Stormy Daniels Hush-Money Payment
- Stormy Daniels: Stormy Daniels, whose real name is Stephanie Clifford, is an adult film actress who claimed to have had a sexual encounter with Donald Trump in 2006. Trump has denied these allegations.
- Hush-Money Payment: In 2016, shortly before the presidential election, Cohen arranged a payment of $130,000 to Daniels in exchange for her silence about the alleged affair. This payment was intended to prevent any negative impact on Trump’s presidential campaign.
3. Legal Charges Against Trump
- Charges: Donald Trump faces 34 counts of falsifying business records in connection with the reimbursement of the hush-money payment to Stormy Daniels. These charges are based on the claim that Trump and his organization falsely documented the payment to conceal its true purpose and avoid legal repercussions.
- Potential Consequences: If convicted, Trump could face penalties including prison time or probation. The severity of the consequences depends on the specifics of the charges and the outcome of the trial.
4. Michael Cohen’s Legal Troubles
- 2018 Guilty Pleas: In 2018, Cohen pleaded guilty to several charges, including campaign finance violations, tax evasion, and lying to Congress. His guilty pleas were related to his role in the hush-money payment and other financial crimes.
- Prison Sentence: Cohen was sentenced to three years in federal prison for these offenses. He later testified before Congress, providing information about his actions and his work for Trump.
5. The Role of Witness Credibility
- Importance in Trials: In legal proceedings, the credibility of witnesses is crucial. The defense and prosecution often attempt to either bolster or undermine a witness’s reliability to influence the jury’s perception and the trial’s outcome.
- Cohen’s Credibility: Cohen’s past lies and legal issues make his credibility a significant point of contention in Trump’s trial. The defense aims to discredit him by highlighting his history of dishonesty, while the prosecution seeks to establish his testimony as truthful and reliable.
6. Legal Procedures and Courtroom Dynamics
- Cross-Examination: Cross-examination is a phase in a trial where the opposing lawyer questions a witness to challenge their testimony and credibility. It is often intense and can reveal inconsistencies or biases in the witness’s statements.
- Judge and Jury: The judge oversees the trial, ensuring legal procedures are followed and making rulings on objections and other legal matters. The jury, composed of citizens, listens to the evidence presented and ultimately decides the defendant’s guilt or innocence based on the information provided during the trial.
7. The Broader Context
- Political and Legal Tensions: Trump’s trial occurs against a backdrop of significant political and legal tensions in the United States. Trump’s presidency and post-presidency period have been marked by various legal challenges and investigations, reflecting deep divisions within the country.
Impact on Trump’s Legacy: The outcome of this trial could have a substantial impact on Trump’s legacy and his potential future in politics. A conviction could hinder his political ambitions and further polarize public opinion.
Please subscribe to Insight Fortnight, our biweekly newsletter!