Hong Kong has been at the center of a major political storm. The heart of the matter is a new security law, referred to as Article 23, that has caused quite a stir both locally and internationally.
Article 23 was passed unanimously by Hong Kong’s legislature, which leans heavily towards Beijing, China’s capital. This law targets a wide array of actions considered treasonous, aiming to clamp down on dissent and opposition. The government insists that this law is crucial for maintaining stability in the city. However, many people see it as a severe blow to the freedoms Hong Kong was known for.
Leaders from Western countries, the United Nations, and various human rights organizations have raised their voices against this law, criticizing it for eroding the liberties of Hong Kong residents. However, China, pushing for the law, brushed off these criticisms as mere “smears,” confident that such opposition would ultimately fail.
The specifics of Article 23 are quite alarming to many. It allows trials to be held behind closed doors, permits police to detain suspects for up to 16 days without charging them, and includes penalties as severe as life imprisonment. Frances Hui, a US-based activist from Hong Kong, described the law as “a final nail in a closed coffin,” highlighting the widespread concern over the diminishing freedom in the city.
In an unprecedented move, 81 lawmakers and public figures from around the world, including the UK, US, Canada, and South Korea, have united to express their “grave concerns” about the legislation. They argue that it undermines the very principles of due process and fair trial, violating international human rights obligations and threatening Hong Kong’s status as an open, international city.
The United States has expressed alarm over the vague and sweeping nature of the law’s provisions, a sentiment echoed by the European Union. The EU worries about the potential impact on Hong Kong’s role as a global business hub. The UK, once the colonial ruler of Hong Kong, has voiced concerns that the law will deepen a culture of self-censorship and infringe on rights and freedoms.
In response to international criticisms, China has staunchly defended Article 23, claiming it is determined to protect its national sovereignty and oppose any foreign interference in Hong Kong’s affairs.
John Lee, Hong Kong’s leader, supports the law, saying it will protect the city from espionage and subversion by foreign forces. However, those who have fought for democracy and freedom in Hong Kong view this as a significant setback, moving the city closer to the systems of mainland China.
Nathan Law, a former lawmaker now in exile in the UK, and other activists fear the chilling effects of this law on civil society and the possibility of it being used to target Hong Kongers abroad or their relatives back home. This concern is not unfounded, as the city has previously taken actions against activists who have fled overseas.
The introduction of Article 23 follows the National Security Law (NSL) imposed by Beijing in 2020, which led to the arrest of over 260 individuals. The NSL was a response to massive pro-democracy protests in 2019 but has been criticized for erasing civil liberties in Hong Kong.
Chris Patten, the last British governor of Hong Kong, has called this legislation “another large nail in the coffin of human rights and the rule of law” in the city, highlighting the international dismay over Hong Kong’s evolving political landscape.
In 1997, Hong Kong was handed back to China by the UK under the “one country, two systems” principle, promising a degree of autonomy for the city. However, the implementation of Article 23 and other similar measures has led many to question whether this promise is being kept, as China’s grip on the city seems only to tighten with time.
This article is based on the following article:
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-68613249
Background Information
Understanding this background is crucial for comprehending the significance of the new security law and the reactions it has elicited both within Hong Kong and around the world. It highlights the ongoing struggle between maintaining Hong Kong’s unique status and Beijing’s desire for greater control.
Historical Background
- British Rule: Hong Kong was a British colony for over 150 years, following the First Opium War (1839-1842). The British obtained control over Hong Kong Island in 1842, and later expanded their control to include Kowloon and the New Territories.
- Handover to China: In 1997, Britain handed Hong Kong back to China under a special agreement known as the Sino-British Joint Declaration. This agreement promised that, under the principle of “one country, two systems,” Hong Kong would retain a high degree of autonomy, including its legal and economic systems, for 50 years after the handover.
Geographical and Cultural Context
- Location: Hong Kong is located on the southeast coast of China. It includes Hong Kong Island, Kowloon Peninsula, the New Territories, and over 200 smaller islands.
- Economic Hub: It’s one of the world’s most significant financial centers and commercial ports, known for its skyline filled with skyscrapers.
- Cultural Mix: The city is a melting pot of cultures, with a mix of Eastern and Western influences, reflecting its history as a British colony and its Chinese heritage.
Political Landscape
- “One Country, Two Systems”: This principle was supposed to ensure that, despite being part of China, Hong Kong would maintain its capitalist economic system and enjoy a degree of political and legal autonomy not granted to other Chinese cities.
- Pro-Democracy Protests: In recent years, there have been significant pro-democracy protests in Hong Kong. The most notable ones occurred in 2014 (the Umbrella Movement) and 2019. These protests were driven by fears that Beijing was increasingly infringing on Hong Kong’s freedoms and autonomy.
- National Security Law (NSL): Imposed by Beijing in 2020, this law criminalizes acts of secession, subversion, terrorism, and collusion with foreign forces. It has been widely criticized for undermining Hong Kong’s autonomy and the civil liberties of its residents.
Article 23
The new security law mentioned in the article is referred to as Article 23. It’s not the first attempt to introduce such legislation. An earlier attempt in 2003 was met with massive public protests and was eventually shelved. This law is viewed by many as a continuation of efforts by Beijing to increase its control over Hong Kong, further eroding the freedoms promised under the “one country, two systems” framework.
International Reactions
The international community, especially countries with strong democratic traditions, has expressed concern over these developments. They argue that the actions taken by Beijing and Hong Kong’s government undermine the city’s autonomy, threaten its status as a global business hub, and violate international agreements and norms regarding human rights.
Debate/Essay Questions
- Is ‘one country, two systems’ still a viable framework for Hong Kong’s governance in light of recent legislative changes, including Article 23?
- Is the criticism of Article 23 by Western leaders and international human rights groups justified, or does it constitute undue interference in China’s internal affairs?
- What measures can the international community take to support Hong Kong’s autonomy and freedoms without escalating tensions with China?
Please subscribe to Insight Fortnight, our biweekly newsletter!