President Biden has exercised executive privilege to withhold audio and video recordings from the special counsel investigation led by Robert Hur. This investigation focused on Biden’s handling of classified documents. The decision was announced through letters sent from the White House and the Department of Justice (DOJ) to House Republican leaders on Thursday. The Republicans had requested these recordings as part of their inquiry into Biden’s conduct, but the DOJ and the White House have refused to comply, citing the protection of executive communications and concerns over the potential misuse of the tapes for political purposes.
Background of the Investigation
The special counsel, Robert Hur, was appointed in January 2023 to investigate classified documents found at a former Biden office and his Delaware home. In October 2023, Hur conducted a recorded interview with President Biden. In his final report, Hur concluded that there was insufficient evidence to charge Biden with any crimes. Hur’s report highlighted that it would be challenging to convince a jury to convict a former president in his eighties of a serious felony requiring willful intent.
The investigation revealed that many documents were retained by mistake. However, evidence of willful retention and disclosure related to some documents found at Biden’s Wilmington, Delaware home was discovered. These documents included records pertaining to a troop surge in Afghanistan during the Obama administration, a period when Biden was vice president and had opposed the surge.
Executive Privilege and Political Tensions
Attorney General Merrick Garland formally requested President Biden to assert executive privilege over the recordings. The DOJ argued that releasing these tapes could discourage future officials from cooperating in similar investigations. It is uncommon for an attorney general to publicly ask a president to invoke executive privilege. Garland emphasized that the request from Congress was seen as an attempt to disparage the DOJ and its officials, which could endanger their safety.
In his statement, Garland rebuked the congressional committees’ actions as unprecedented attacks on the DOJ. He vowed to protect the integrity of the Justice Department and its employees. The White House also reiterated these concerns in its communication with House Republicans, emphasizing that transcripts of the interviews had already been provided and that the demand for the recordings appeared politically motivated.
The White House counsel, Ed Siskel, wrote a letter to House Republicans, stating, “The absence of a legitimate need for the audio recordings lays bare your likely goal — to chop them up, distort them, and use them for partisan political purposes.” He added that demanding such sensitive and constitutionally protected law enforcement materials from the Executive Branch to manipulate them for political gain was inappropriate.
Congressional Response
House Republicans have criticized the DOJ’s investigations into both Biden and former President Donald Trump as politically biased. They argue that Trump, who faces 40 federal charges for retaining classified documents at Mar-a-Lago, has been treated more harshly than Biden. Republicans claim that Garland’s refusal to release the recordings hinders their investigation into Biden’s actions.
The GOP’s efforts to hold Garland in contempt of Congress revolve around the claim that the DOJ is obstructing their inquiry. They argue that without the recordings, their investigation into Biden’s handling of classified materials remains incomplete. House Speaker Mike Johnson accused Biden of suppressing the tape to avoid potential damage during an election year. Johnson stated that the American people would not be able to hear why prosecutors felt Biden was an “elderly man with a poor memory” and thus shouldn’t be charged.
Democrats, including Rep. Jamie Raskin, assert that Republicans are using these proceedings to undermine the DOJ’s independence and that the information provided so far is sufficient for oversight. Raskin argued that the transcripts already given to Congress should be adequate for their needs, dismissing the GOP’s demands for the recordings as politically driven.
Broader Implications
This clash over executive privilege and the recordings comes during a critical election year, heightening the political stakes. House Republicans have suggested that the refusal to release the tapes is an attempt by Biden to prevent potentially embarrassing information from becoming public. Conversely, the DOJ and the White House maintain that the protection of executive communications is essential for maintaining the integrity of high-profile investigations.
Garland has emphasized that the DOJ has gone to extraordinary lengths to provide information to Congress about the special counsel’s investigation, including the transcript of Biden’s interview. However, releasing the audio could jeopardize future sensitive and high-profile investigations by making witnesses less likely to cooperate voluntarily.
The controversy underscores the ongoing political battles in Washington and the broader debate over transparency and accountability in government investigations. As the House Republicans push forward with their contempt proceedings against Garland, the outcome could have significant implications for the balance of power between the executive branch and Congress. The DOJ has warned that such actions could create unnecessary and unwarranted conflict, undermining the ability to conduct effective law enforcement investigations.
This article is based on the following articles:
https://www.opb.org/article/2024/05/16/biden-special-counsel-interview-executive-privilege
Background Information
Executive Privilege
Executive privilege is a power claimed by the President of the United States and other members of the executive branch to resist certain subpoenas and other interventions by the legislative and judicial branches of government. This privilege is intended to protect the confidentiality of communications within the executive branch, particularly those that involve national security, military, and diplomatic issues.
The idea behind executive privilege is to ensure that the President can receive candid advice from advisors and conduct internal deliberations without fear of immediate public disclosure. However, this privilege is not absolute and can be challenged in court, especially if there is a significant need for the information in criminal investigations or other critical proceedings.
The Special Counsel and the Department of Justice
The special counsel is a lawyer appointed to investigate, and potentially prosecute, cases involving government officials where there might be a conflict of interest for the regular prosecutors in the Department of Justice (DOJ). The appointment of a special counsel is meant to ensure an independent investigation.
The Department of Justice is a federal executive department responsible for enforcing the laws of the United States, ensuring public safety against foreign and domestic threats, and providing leadership in preventing and controlling crime. The DOJ also seeks fair and impartial administration of justice for all Americans.
Investigation into Classified Documents
Classified documents are government documents that are officially deemed to require protection against unauthorized disclosure for reasons of national security. The handling of such documents is strictly regulated to prevent sensitive information from falling into the wrong hands.
The investigation into President Biden’s handling of classified documents began after it was discovered that documents from his time as vice president were found in locations such as a former office and his Delaware home. Special Counsel Robert Hur was appointed to investigate whether any laws were broken in the handling of these documents.
A similar investigation is ongoing into former President Donald Trump’s handling of classified documents. This investigation includes accusations that Trump kept top-secret government documents at his Mar-a-Lago home and club, and has resulted in several federal charges against him.
Political Context
The political context surrounding these investigations is highly charged. Republicans have criticized the DOJ’s investigations into both Biden and Trump, claiming bias and unequal treatment. They argue that the DOJ is politically motivated, particularly in how it has handled the investigations of the two presidents.
President Biden’s exercise of executive privilege over the recordings from his interview with the special counsel has been portrayed by Republicans as an attempt to shield himself from scrutiny during an election year. Democrats argue that the GOP’s demands for the recordings are politically driven and unnecessary for their oversight functions, emphasizing the importance of protecting the confidentiality of executive communications.
Merrick Garland and Congressional Contempt
Merrick Garland is the Attorney General of the United States, heading the DOJ. He has been a central figure in the controversy over the executive privilege claims and the handling of the investigations into classified documents.
Congress has the power to hold individuals in contempt if they refuse to comply with subpoenas or other requests for information. This can lead to legal proceedings to enforce compliance. In this case, House Republicans are considering holding Garland in contempt for refusing to release the recordings of Biden’s interview. The DOJ, however, argues that Garland is following standard procedures to protect sensitive information and maintain the integrity of law enforcement investigations.
Summary of the Dispute
The dispute involves balancing the need for congressional oversight with the need to protect sensitive executive branch communications. While Congress has a role in overseeing the executive branch, the executive branch also has a legitimate interest in maintaining the confidentiality of certain communications to ensure effective governance. This balance is at the heart of the current controversy involving the Biden administration and congressional Republicans.
Debate/Essay Questions
- Should a sitting president be allowed to assert executive privilege to withhold information from congressional investigations, or does this undermine the principle of transparency in government? (While advocates of executive privilege argue that it is necessary to protect the confidentiality of executive branch communications and ensure that advisors can provide candid advice without fear of public disclosure, opponents argue that withholding information from Congress undermines transparency and accountability, preventing effective oversight of the executive branch.)
- Are the House Republicans’ demands for the recordings of President Biden’s interview politically motivated, or are they a legitimate exercise of congressional oversight?
- Is the Department of Justice’s handling of the investigations into President Biden and former President Trump consistent and fair, or does it reflect a partisan bias?
Please subscribe to Insight Fortnight, our biweekly newsletter!